tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-712590571826517347.post4052591802685053009..comments2008-05-31T21:23:44.539+08:00Comments on 哲學哲學雞蛋糕(舊站): 評Zemach, "Putnam's theory on the reference of substance terms"朱家安http://www.blogger.com/profile/08805839838132417271noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-712590571826517347.post-15378156351185761242008-04-07T22:11:00.000+08:002008-04-07T22:11:00.000+08:00謝謝你的鼓勵~這篇文章是去年一月寫成的,一年多來在各個論壇的哲學版從來沒有人回覆它。知道有人把它看完...謝謝你的鼓勵~<BR/><BR/>這篇文章是去年一月寫成的,一年多來在各個論壇的哲學版從來沒有人回覆它。<BR/>知道有人把它看完並且覺得寫得好,著實讓我感到很高興。朱家安https://www.blogger.com/profile/08805839838132417271noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-712590571826517347.post-11812799827602007762008-04-07T14:24:00.000+08:002008-04-07T14:24:00.000+08:00拍手拍手 寫的好~拍手拍手 寫的好~Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com